• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Subbies United

Let's Keep the Bastards Honest !!

  • Join Now
  • Login

We support Subcontractors Alliance

  • Home
  • Members Forum
  • About Us
    • Terms of Access to SubbiesUnited
    • Why Join Subbies United
    • Introduction to a Dodgy Builder
      • Predators Modus Operandi
      • My First Predator
      • Predator Credits
  • For Subbies
    • How to Become a Secured Creditor
      • PPSR – Personal Property Security Register
      • SCC – Subcontractors Charges ACT 1974
      • CRCG RIMFIRE – CHANGE OF LIQUIDATOR
    • Name & Shame
      • Name & Shame – BCIPA
      • Name & Shame – QCAT
    • What if your Account is NOT Paid?
      • BCIPA – How to Make a Claim
      • QBCC – Contracts
    • Compiling Evidence
    • Building Complaints in QLD – QCAT
    • Gathering Evidence
  • Resources
    • Voidable Transaction or Preferential Payments
    • Unfair contract terms
    • 67P – Motivates Builders To Pay Up
    • QBCC Complaints
    • Case Studies on Litigious Builders
    • Excuses for non-payment of account
    • Links to Stories on Dodgy Builders
  • INDUSTRY NEWS
  • Builders
  • Contact Us

My First Predator

MY FIRST PREDATOR

It is a sickening feeling when, after a minor disagreement with our project manager, out of the blue, a predatory builder tells you he is taking you to CCT (now QCAT) and that he is suing your company for rectification of the product we had just installed, a product he had said he was very happy with.

It rattles through your mind, "what the hell is the CCT, what do I do, where do I go from here?"

I have never heard of the CCT, I quickly Google it, the second thing I do is call my solicitor, the cost starts mounting in 6 minute blocks, his advice is as always very sound, he helps guide me through the process to defend what was to become an all encompassing and ever increasing claim against our company.

My solicitor tells me that CCT (now QCAT) has a history of settling in favour of the home owner, this project was the builders own home, (looks like I am in the shit up to my neck).

  • The job we did was for $22,000 with no BSA contract (illegal to start with as any job over $3,300 is classed as building work and requires a contract),
  • Let’s take a step back, the predator makes late payment to us with his well worn and often used rider “Payment of your account should not be mistaken as acceptance of your work. I reserve the right to hold you responsible for any defective work that presents itself once I've had your work properly inspected, please confirm that I have your acceptance of these terms”.
  • It was the first time I had ever received payment with such a clause but obviously not the first time my predator had used it, (warning bells were ringing, Red lights were flashing, sirens’ were blaring)!
  • With hindsight I know now that my predator is paying us so that he is seen to be doing the right thing but will full intentions of recovering it through his tried and tested “personal” court in QCAT (let’s now call the CCT by its current name of QCAT).
  • The predator claims $8,000 for alleged defects on the say so of his painter (apparently now an expert on glass and stainless steel),
  • Two weeks later he increases the claim to $13,000 keeping the pressure on,
  • A short time later he increased the claim against us to the full amount of $22,000, this time for replacement of the product after his cleaner found a couple of imperfections on a panel of glass.
  • So far we are at the mercy of his painter of 10 years (who the predator says is almost like a partner and looks after his jobs for him) and his cleaner, it would be laughable if it were not so serious.
  • By the time the predator had finished with his ambit claims, on a whim he has escalated the amount up to $30,000 simply because he can, its allowable under the system, a system which has worked for him many times in the past so there is no reason why it won’t work again.
  • The predator knows that if he claims an exorbitant amount it is the law of averages that he will be awarded approximately what he wants, for want of a better word, his “target” amount.

I am thinking, this has the potential to send our company broke, if it up to 30k already, what is to stop him from increasing it to 50k?

My investigations so far tell me that he has done this many times before, every time my predator increases his claim in QCAT I call my solicitor for advice, the cost is mounting.

For the first time in my business life, I feel totally out of my depth and not in control of the situation.

You think to yourself, how can this be? The job is finished to an exceptional standard (subsequently proven) so how can anyone say or think otherwise?

THE DECISION

Almost two years later my predator was awarded a paltry $102.42 to compensate him for cleaning the glass, this amount was awarded because we had been warned off his property and couldn’t perform the cleaning ourselves, all his ambit claims were proven to be baseless and as I said earlier, QCAT almost always awards in favour of the home-owner so with that in mind we were over the moon with the result.

He was thoroughly shamed and discredited when evidence of his past (while inadmissible) was put into evidence to demonstrate that this round of dishonest and deceptive conduct was not the first time.

Through lack of knowing the process in regard to costs, we verbally made a request, had we made a written submission outlining all our costs and the reason for them, the result may have been very different.

My first predator had 3 different claims on this one house, it is quite unbelievable that the system allows this to happen, it is even more unbelievable that the predator could be so incompetent in his job, that he didn't notice these imaginary problems as they happened, after all, he was there all day every day. What does this say about his ability as a builder and project manager?

The thing is that my predator may have appealed had I not comprehensively discredited him and exposed him for the crook he is, an appeal would have been a massive injustice.

 THE COST

By the time it was over, it had cost us:

  • $10,000 for legal advice,
  • $7,000 in expert and scientific analysis by a metallurgical engineer and others to refute the bogus defects,
  • $1,200 for the services of a private detective (god bless him),
  • Countless hours of gathering evidence, mounting a defence and deciding how to conduct the defence in front of an adjudicator who was a highly trained Barrister.

Happily, it cost the predator at minimum:

  • $110,000 (yes that’s right, $110,000) when his dishonest past was exposed and he was forced to pay two 13 year old debts that he had run away from before he re-invented himself in Queensland.

There was no compensation for our outlay, you just have to cop it sweet and that is where the system let us down. Our costs were extremely high when looked at in isolation but that was because at the time, we had no knowledge or experience in dealing with this type of fraudulent claim.

 

Primary Sidebar

Protect your business against losses from non-payment with Prasidium credit insurance

                           Click here to contact

We restructure small businesses to make them a more viable operation

                           Click here to contact

Offering virtual administrative services

Click here to contact

Specializing in custom gates, screens & front fencing. Contact Alchemy Gates for a free quote today.

Servicing South Brisbane & Gold Coast
Click here to contact

Proudly supporting local businesses

www.prettystitches.com.au

Advertise with us

JOIN THE MAILING LIST

Sign up for SubbiesUnited Mailing List & receive industry updates.

(Does not give you forum access).

CLICK TO SUBSCRIBE

Search News Articles

Recent Media Reports

Contractor winning Qld projects denies link to $53m tax bill

Heran Group stings off-plan apartment buyers 40 per cent extra in Midwater on Gold Coast

Privium Homes collapse: Wife of collapsed builder’s bizarre court grilling

Privium collapse: Founder’s son Jared Harder tells court he can’t recall receiving six-figure payments

Former Midwater Main Beach builder Tomkins alleges illicit kickback scheme on project

More Posts from this Category

Top News Stories

Contractor winning Qld projects denies link to $53m tax bill

Heran Group stings off-plan apartment buyers 40 per cent extra in Midwater on Gold Coast

Privium Homes collapse: Wife of collapsed builder’s bizarre court grilling

Privium collapse: Founder’s son Jared Harder tells court he can’t recall receiving six-figure payments

Former Midwater Main Beach builder Tomkins alleges illicit kickback scheme on project

Footer

Useful Links

  • Terms of Access to SubbiesUnited
  • Member Login
  • Register
  • Help & FAQ

CONNECT

  • Facebook

ABOUT US

SubbiesUnited is not “anti builder”, we support strong builders.
We are “anti theft” of hard working subbies money.

It’s not just about the builders who go broke, businesses all over Australia Liquidate every day for a variety of reasons.

It’s about the ones that engage in calculated criminal behaviour such as providing false information to the regulators or inducing subbies to work on a site when they know they cannot or are not going to pay them because of a fraudulent scheme. Its about the participation of the banks, pre insolvency advisors and builder appointed Liquidators to fraudulently defeat creditors.

Liquidators should always be appointed by creditors to ensure a thorough investigation takes place.

We want the rogues investigated and prosecuted for fraud. 


  • SubbiesUnited was created to provide subbies with collaborative information on building companies that are showing signs of insolvency or struggling to pay their creditors. The signs are always there, we just need to get the message to each other before it happens.
  • We provide subbies with up to date news on builders in Administration or Liquidation and the best strategies to get a return.
  • There are some extremely litigious builders out there who would rather sue you than pay you. Often they sue you so they don’t have to pay you. We will expose them.
  • The construction industry is renowned for building companies setting up illegal Phoenix operations, shifting assets, then liquidating sending subbies broke. We work with other subcontractor & supplier organisations & Governments to stop what amounts to legalised theft on a massive scale though pre packaged liquidations. Insolvency is used as a means to defraud Subbies.
  • Our aim is to limit the financial damage before it happens with our “members only forum”, an early warning system for the benefit of all our members.

Copyright © 2025 Subbies United
Website by Align Media

  • Terms of Access to SubbiesUnited
  • Member Login
  • Register
  • Help & FAQ